Review of another party’s work
Independent FEA peer review
Review an existing analysis model, calculations and supporting design information, with documented findings and defined response and closure stages.
What is reviewed
The agreed review addresses the design basis, modelling assumptions, loading, boundary conditions, assessment methods and conclusions. Targeted checks examine modelling choices that could change the assessment conclusion.
For an operating machine, the review also examines how the model represents its current configuration and how predictions compare with suitable luff trends, SCADA data or other relevant measurements. The review checks the basis for adjusted inputs, the conditions compared and unresolved differences. Agreement with one measured response does not verify every load case or component.
The engagement defines access to model files, the extent of model interrogation or independent calculations, and the agreed response cycles. Independence and any prior involvement are considered before the appointment. Developing a separate model or reconstructing the analysis is a distinct scope.
Discuss your peer reviewAgreed outputs
- Review basis
Confirm the documents, model version, criteria and extent of review.
- Findings register
Record comments, their engineering significance and the response required.
- Response review and closure
Review the agreed responses and record closed comments and outstanding matters.
A completed peer review does not, by itself, constitute certification or acceptance of the complete machine.
Specialist support within a machine auditEngineering support
Discuss your peer review.
Include the machine, available design or operating information, and your required timing.
